Yes, relevance.
You have ruled that only questions pertaining to public office-holders can be discussed before this committee. That's your ruling. Are you going to consistently apply that ruling, or are you going to do so selectively?
On October 20th, 2009. See this statement in context.
October 20th, 2009 / 9:20 a.m.
Conservative
Pierre Poilievre Conservative Nepean—Carleton, ON
Yes, relevance.
You have ruled that only questions pertaining to public office-holders can be discussed before this committee. That's your ruling. Are you going to consistently apply that ruling, or are you going to do so selectively?
See context to find out what was said next.