That is under the code.
Then you made reference to the Conflict of Interest Act and you showed the parallel. That is what triggered my interest, because if you look at the language there, what we have now in both the code and the act is unclear as to whether or not you are talking about “interfere” in the sense of “did interfere” or “tried to interfere”. You have no adverb or adjective in there.
So I'm asking you this question: would it appear that we should consider making a minor amendment to the Conflict of Interest Act so that the act will reflect the Federal Court of Appeal decision in that regard?