Okay. In trying to make it a little easier, I've probably made it a little more complicated.
We have a subamendment proposed, which is to amend the proposed amendment of Mr. Siksay. Basically it is to drop the proviso at the end, which is to wait until the commissioner has reported her findings. This is very clear. I don't think we need a lot of debate on the explanation of the subamendment. It's basically not to wait until the commissioner has reported.
Does anybody really want to debate that? Does everyone understand it? Everyone does? Then I'll put the question.
Madam Freeman's subamendment would delete the reference to the last addition in regard to “waiting until such time as the commissioner has reported”. That would be deleted from the amendment.
I want a recorded division, please.
(Subamendment negatived: nays 6; yeas 4)
We now move back to the amendment by Mr. Siksay.