Just a moment, Mr. Wrzesnewskyj. Maybe we can deal with this.
I think the original question was a very good question, and it had to do with whether--really succinctly--indirect lobbying exists or doesn't exist in your world. Instead of going straight to a public office-holder, you go to someone who clearly has significant influence over that public office-holder. Is that within your purview?
Even under section 18 of the Conflict of Interest Act we have anti-avoidance provisions where the purpose of the activity would be to circumvent the rules. Certainly going through an intermediary, as it were, effectively achieves the same objective without in fact directly contravening the rules. So the question is very good from the member.
Do you have the authority to look through the transaction or the communication?