Yes, Mr. Chair. Earlier today you ruled against Mr. Del Mastro on the basis that in his comments or his questions he was not referring directly to the commissioner's report and therefore they weren't relevant. You ruled that out of order. That was sustained by the majority of the committee.
The last several rounds of questions have dealt primarily with the minister's letter and not the commissioner's report at all, so shouldn't the same ruling apply? Either it's a member's time and they can talk about whatever they want or it has to be relevant to what the witness is discussing and is here to report on.