Thank you.
Would it be fair to say that the act, because it's so old--to use your grandmother analogy--although it's been described as perhaps significant...? “Significant” isn't always a positive thing. You can have some significant impacts that are negative.
Mr. Marleau also testified that what he sees happening, because we haven't changed the infrastructure, meaning the actual legislation, and updated it, is that we are now seeing the Federal Accountability Act causing the Access to Information Act itself to buckle.
Would that basically be a fair assessment?