Okay.
Mr. Wrzesnewskyj, on a point of order, raised relevance. I accepted it: that in fact it is in order, that in fact the matter being raised is not relevant to the matter currently on the table before the committee, that in fact it is a matter that is coming after we excuse our witnesses.
The chair ruled that the point of order is correct, and that Mr. Del Mastro should, on the basis of relevance, move on to matters related to the commissioner. Mr. Del Mastro has challenged my decision. It is not debatable, and we must go to a vote. A recorded vote has been asked for.
Shall the decision of the chair be sustained?
(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 5; nays 5)