On a point of order, this meeting has gone on for a while. I confess I'm getting older in years and my short-term memory is getting shorter with each meeting of this committee, but I believe that some time ago in this meeting we had a vote to move to Mr. Martin's motion and to end the discussion on whether or not the committee was going to ask the minister to appear again.
I think we've already dealt with that question. There have been multiple circular arguments and tangential discussions that have very little relevance to the motion before us. But I believe that about an hour and a half ago there was a vote on this committee, which carried, that we should move to Mr. Martin's motion. And then there was an amendment made to that. There were multiple circular arguments around that. Now there is a subamendment made to the amendment and multiple circular arguments are being made to try to bring it back to the point that we originally voted against.
Somewhere in there is a perversion of the rules of order of this committee. With respect, I think you should rule on that.