Thank you, Mr. Siksay.
If I may, I'd like to address the point raised by Mr. Siksay on the precedence of motions.
You can appreciate that if the committee is in the middle of doing something and someone makes a motion to do something else before that work is done, it would be counterproductive to be in a position where you must decide on that motion before you finish the work.
The Martin motion is very specific to the discussion on the minister's response, and that motion is going to be dealt with as soon as the members have given their final inputs on the role. Then that item of order of business—which is to consider the minister's response to the quick-fix report—will be completed, unless there are any other motions coming from members on that order of reference. Okay?
Mr. Martin's motion is a consequence of our meetings, our consideration, that we're continuing right now. So we will be doing that. It's not as if it's something that's done after we have finished this; no, it is the conclusion of this discussion. It is the only motion on the floor that specifically relates to the order of the day, which is to consider the minister's response.
If other motions on unrelated matters come up, they are dealt with after all of the other scheduled business. They are entitled to be heard, but not to pre-empt other approved and scheduled business of the committee.
I think you wanted to rebut that a little bit.