I think that's clear. It encapsulates the wishes of the committee.
(Motion as amended agreed to)
We'll do this, and if it is solely with regard to this report, the privacy.... We have completed that item with Madam Simson's motion, which has been stood and may be considered at any time, should the committee so wish. She can bring it back on the floor if necessary--and I hope that never happens.
Our second order of the day is with regard to access to information. The letter of response from the minister has been circulated to you. I think you know what it says. There are three items here. Two documents were circulated by our researchers, which I think are extremely important. A lot of work went into them, and they basically tried to pull together everything that has happened on access to information into two documents.
The first one is...kind of all of it, except the second document, which has recommendations that came out of the Right to Know Week that was run by the Information Commission during a break week. I asked them to prepare this for our information, because it puts us where we have been and may help us with further work.
I've also asked them to give us a brief run-through of what's here. I want it on the record as to the extent of the work that has been done and the resources available, so we don't get into this problem we've had in the past, where things like a discussion paper that nobody seemed to have doesn't lose the attention of the committee. I don't know how that happened. It was tabled in the House, but it was never dated. It never got referred to this committee, for some odd reason. That was back in early 2007. Don't ask me how it happened. It shouldn't have. I think we'll forget about who's at fault here. We do have a document.
Élise, Alysia, and Dara, I don't know how you'd like to do this, but could you help the committee appreciate the excellent work you have all done?