It might very well be. This was almost a year ago. I'm starting a little bit into it. It says that the member for Mississauga South--that's you:
...indicated that, as chair of the committee, he had ruled this motion inadmissible as it did not include any reference to the Conflict of Interest Code for Members or any ethical standards that may have been violated but rather actually made direct reference to potential violations of the Canada Elections Act.
It goes on:
The member for Mississauga South contended that the access to information, privacy and ethics committee has now embarked on a study which is beyond its mandate...
He's citing your words, Mr. Chair. You were saying that this study was beyond our committee's mandate.