I found one of your decisions quite surprising. When Democracy Watch asked you to look into possible violations of the act by the Prime Minister or his office, the Attorney General or a number of cabinet ministers, you said that because there was insufficient credible evidence, you would not conduct an investigation.
Why did you not start by investigating to see whether there was any basis to the allegations before rejecting the request made by Democracy Watch? You rejected this request by Democracy Watch out of hand, even though your role should have been to investigate and subsequently respond.