When you referred to the Mr. Soudas affair, you said that he had been exonerated and that if he had been covered by the new act, you were of the view that he would have been exonerated by it as well.
I am quite surprised that in your view there is not automatically interference when the Prime Minister's chief of staff raises questions about a particular matter. It is not difficult to figure out that this individual is trying to influence someone or some decision. I think that there is an automatic possibility of an investigation.