Chair, the reason I raise it is that when I read the motion that's before us--and not being a lawyer, and it's in somewhat legalese--it seems rather bloodless, in the sense of there's no urgency about it. I believe that this is an extremely serious issue. We need to express our determination that it be followed up on and that kind of thing.
Now, I hear what Mr. Walsh is saying, that he sees a difference in circumstance. But I'm still uneasy about that, because it strikes me that the other paragraph makes it very clear that we're not going to let this go and that we think that should it work out differently, we want somebody, namely the Speaker, to be actively engaged in ensuring our privilege.