I'm quite sure that regardless of what I say, the frequent users would probably argue for a volume discount. But certainly my remarks earlier were directed to a situation where you had a small number of requesters, as you just said, making a large number of the requests to the institutions. And it wasn't, of course, addressing what Robert Marleau was speaking about, which is the small number of appellants who are frequent customers, if you will, in terms of his appeal process.
I think that the situation in B.C., where commercial applicants are charged full freight, if you will, when they're making requests for commercial purposes, would probably deal with a number of those kinds of requesters. I don't know that I would support an escalating fee structure to be a disincentive to the exercise of the right of access. Frankly, from a policy perspective, that's certainly not the choice taken here. And I think that what ultimately might happen, of course, is that people will find work-arounds. Similar to the situation with the residency or citizenship requirement, you'll find those people who are engaged in this having requests made by other individuals so that they get their numbers of requests down and therefore escape any escalating fee structure. So I'm not sure how well that could be enforced as well.