Yes. Thank you for the question. We do have an ongoing watch on this subject.
I'll just make two quick comments and then once again refer it to my very able assistant commissioner, who works on the national security issues.
We did look at the report analyzing the whole-body scanners in Schiphol. Interestingly enough, some of the information that came out of that test was that some people, particularly some women--stewardesses--preferred, in the context of security clearances to board planes, something like a whole-body scanner rather than being patted down, which for some people, particularly people of certain religions, can be felt as very intrusive. That gave us an interesting perspective on it.
Secondly, yes, we do watch what happens with our colleagues in Homeland Security. This is what happens in Canada now. There is no direct eyesight: there's Joe or Jane going through the scanner. I think there are some cartoons to that effect in our calendar, because we have to keep a sense of humour about all this. There's no direct line of vision in Canada. That's our understanding.
As for Homeland Security, my understanding is that they have a more powerful type of scanner than we have in Canada.
Is that true, Chantal?