I'm interested in your comments, because you talk about what's happening in the U.S. under the leadership of the President. I know that when we were under government ops, when we were looking at the stimulus spending and trying to keep track of the amount of money that was being spent and the number of jobs being created, we looked at how it was being done in the U.S. It was very thorough and it was very timely, and you never had to wonder how the money was being spent, where it was being spent, or how many jobs were being created. That was totally contrary to what we faced or we saw here in Canada. We kept insisting on having a much more open, transparent, accountable reporting of the stimulus spending here, but it just didn't seem to garner the same type of support. There were always reasons why it couldn't be done, or explanations: “We're trying to”, or “We're working at it.”
But I would think when you have something that's being done so well in another jurisdiction, you don't need to recreate the wheel. I'm wondering what you found in terms of looking at what's happened in the U.S., Australia, and Britain, and if you would tell us, of these three jurisdictions, which one you think is well ahead of the game. Is there anything you think we might want to emulate on a go-forward basis?