I think we all expressed confidence in the Information Commissioner by approving estimates for the said commissioner. As such, we should have no problem allowing that office to carry out an investigation and to do so unobstructed by this committee.
I understand the process by which these investigations take place is extremely rigorous and detailed and that their findings will be made public. When those findings are released, we should immediately commence a study of them, have the commissioner here and any parties to that investigation who we think would add something to the discussion.
We lose nothing by waiting for the commissioner to do that work and proceeding with our examination immediately afterwards. In fact, our discussion here would probably be quite enriched by hearing the commissioner's findings before the pursuit by the committee.