Okay. It states:
Witnesses appearing before committees enjoy the same freedom of speech and protection from arrest and molestation as do Members of Parliament. At the committee's discretion, witnesses may be allowed to testify in camera when dealing with confidential matters of state or sensitive commercial or personal information. Under special circumstances, witnesses have been permitted to appear anonymously or under a pseudonym.
So I would suggest that since we are dealing with sensitive information here involving an investigation by the Information Commissioner, and based upon the practices of the House, we are directed by O'Brien-Bosc and by the Standing Orders, that we should take into consideration that if we're going to hear information that Mr. Togneri is going to present today--and he has been advised, as Mr. Poilievre has already said, by the Assistant Information Commissioner--that this should be done in camera.