I've been patient, but what I'd like to do at this point is ask members who wish to raise points of order—which is their right, first of all—to state clearly the basis for the point, rather than have a bit of a story leading up to it. I want to know the basis for the point of order. It could be something like relevance, or repetition, or not related to the matter before this committee, and stuff like that, but be very specific.
Mr. Bezan, before you start debating it, what is the nature of your point of order?