Yes. I know that I raised a point earlier about the nature of the committee's study. I don't want to put too fine a point on it, but the committee did make a specific decision on April 1, 2010, for which I do have the recorded minutes. They state, “It was agreed, — That the Committee undertake a study on Proactive Disclosure.”
“Proactive Disclosure” is displayed as a proper noun, with a capital P and a capital D, meaning that it has specific properties to it.
The committee can study anything it wants. If the committee wants to put forward a new motion to study open government or the Ten Commandments or the BNA Act or the nature of democracy itself.... There are any number of broad subject areas that we can commence a study on, given that we are in fact the masters of our own domain. The point is, we didn't decide to study any of those aforementioned things; we decided to discuss proactive disclosure.