I want to go back to the issue I started out with. Clearly, Mr. Togneri was in violation of the act, the Access to Information Act. I guess we all acknowledge that. He's acknowledged that, as having made a stupid mistake.
Knowing that he was in violation of the act—you would have known that, and all of those who had reached a consensus that the release of this information was the right thing to do—why would anyone listen to Mr. Togneri when he asked to have the information unreleased, knowing that what he was doing was in fact in violation of the act?