It strikes me that none of the motions that have been put forward by any of the members... Let me start with the premise you have constructed on behalf of the committee. You said that after it was acknowledged that the witness you wanted to see return was not here, discussion was then complete, and any motions thereafter were not to be entertained. It was on the basis of that rationale that you rejected Ms. Davidson's motions. Therefore, the motions moved by members of the other parties should not have been entertained in the first place. Therefore, they are nullified as though they never existed.
On June 3rd, 2010. See this statement in context.