Well, I think I addressed that in my comments, in saying that he could make another motion, or his amendment could be after Mr. Walsh and Mr. Baird. So that would be an amendment.
It's moot. By virtue of that, I called for debate. I believe, sir, that his motion is in order, but it's only because he would have to make an argument that the substitute would be able to satisfy or advise the committee with regard to some of the consequences—and probably in the context of a government policy statement.
Mr. Poilievre.