You said in your last paragraph or so that you are concerned with the criticisms that have been laid against the office, and yet it seems that throughout your testimony you can only apply the law or you can only apply the code. Without a law reform commissioner, without having knowledgeable people look at these things, is it possible for you to prepare a submission as to what would be a law or a code that you could actually enforce?
I think people are concerned that since 2008, of the eight studies that you undertook, in each case it was that the complaints weren't founded, but I think people just didn't quite understand. Is that because the act doesn't have enough teeth?
I know even the Auditor General can only enforce the rules as they're written. She doesn't get to rewrite the rules to say it would have been better if the rules had been this way because it still stinks. How do you suggest as a committee that we go forward such that you had better legislation to enforce?