No. There was one case early where I found there was a contravention. In fact, the House of Commons saw fit to change the rule, so in the future that particular activity will not be a contravention.
Basically it is correct. Within the terms of the act or the code and the other investigation I've done, I have not found a contravention. But in the course of doing those investigations, I think I've clarified the rules significantly. I've identified where there may need to be some amendments.
I have had some results. For example, people are no longer putting one party's logo on the cheques. Guidelines have been developed for fundraising. A number of results have come out of those investigations. But the fact of the matter is that I have not found that the individual has contravened the letter of the code or the act.