I haven't considered that question in detail to make a submission. Perhaps if there were a failure to comply with section 15--the activities that a public office holder is not supposed to do--it would be appropriate to have a penalty.
On the receipt of gifts they should not have received, perhaps there should be a penalty there. I could probably list eight or ten with no trouble at all that would make more sense than a failure to meet a deadline. That isn't to say there shouldn't still be a penalty for failure to meet a deadline; I'm just saying there seems to be a gap there. It's not something where the subject matter lends itself to an investigation, because it's a black-and-white case. It's like running a red light. They just did something they shouldn't have done, and there's no investigation necessary.