Yes. That was the one discontinuance that we did. That was simply because had we realized, when we got the complaint, that in fact the Conservative Party was not a person, we probably would not have proceeded at all. But we realized after we'd launched the investigation, when we kind of looked at it—because I think some of the other parties are corporate entities. So it was just an odd circumstance.
But technically, it simply was not covered by the terminology of the legislation. And the thing was, when you compare it to other similar provisions elsewhere in the code or the act, they used words like “entity” or something, which would have covered them, but the provision we were trying to interpret said “person”. So I thought, well, if the act says what it says, the one thing I don't do is interpret something on which the act is very clear.