It was an interesting case because it was people who worked together. The commissioner made reference to the fact that people often refer to each other as friends, but when in fact you look at the type of people the act was meant to cover for friends, in relation to the act, because it was right next to the term “relative”, it had to mean someone with whom you had close proximity. Therefore, in this particular case, the commissioner found that they were not friends.
If you give me two minutes, I could probably find the actual words the commissioner used to....