With regard to the street view imaging technology by Google and Canpages, one point I just want to clarify is that those were never the subject of an investigation by the commissioner. Those were dealt with by correspondence between the commissioner and the organizations. So the extent of what we know is not as in-depth as it would have been had there been an investigation into those matters.
But on the basis of the correspondence and the response of the organizations, there has been a lot of movement on the part of both organizations to comply with or to move along in harmony with the recommendations the commissioner has made, including notification to neighbourhoods before they arrive, discussions with vulnerable stakeholders and groups, take-down procedures, retention and deletion mechanisms, and other such protections. So on the basis of that correspondence there's been a lot of movement. Of course there could always be improved notification, and there could always be ongoing improvements to blurring technology, but so far there's been great improvement and movement toward the commissioner's wishes.