You've mentioned the term “ethical wall” about 30 times since you sat down here. It's as if you're trying to introduce some new idea to us, some new concept. I think this idea of an ethical wall is kind of a fatuous notion, personally. Walls in and of themselves don't have ethics. The ethics have to reside with the individuals, and it seems like this is a construct of convenience to defend the indefensible, which is your untenable position as chief of staff.
Mr. Wild has gone to great lengths to manufacture this notion that you're here to sell this ethical wall, but most of us don't have any confidence in blind trusts. People joke about them being venetian blind trusts, and I don't see why we should have any confidence in this new fabrication of an ethical wall. What's it made out of?