This is a very good question. We have looked at what is being done in these three countries. I said, in my presentation, that they offer interesting possibilities, because all three developed their approach in a different manner. I think that we have things to learn from these three countries.
In the United States, those in charge were much more aggressive, if I can say so. They decided to conduct trials and if they made any mistakes, to correct them afterward.
Australia has a much more measured and structured approach. Research was done by a team, a group of experts studied all the issues—this is, of course, a complicated procedure—and they made recommendations. The government is currently implementing these measures.
In Great Britain, the initiative began in 2007. There as well studies were conducted and the emphasis was put on the government's efficiency in delivering its services.
The underlying philosophies are different as is the method of implementing the systems. As far as we are concerned, I suggested that you follow a “made-in-Canada” strategy, because we have specific issues in Canada, such as intellectual property and official languages. We have our own framework for protecting personal information and national security. We must evaluate these things within the Canadian framework while learning lessons from other countries.