Do you mean the CAIRS website? It's no longer available. The secretariat decided to no longer ask institutions to input into the CAIRS system, and that's what led to complaints to my office and led to the investigation. I've provided you with a detailed account of the investigation and with some of the background of the CAIRS system.
At the time, the representations we got from the secretariat said that the CAIRS system was really antiquated technology, and we agreed with that representation. It became very costly to modify the CAIRS system in order to adapt it and include the 17 new institutions that became covered as part of the Federal Accountability Act.
At the time we were consulted, before that decision was made, our position was that the CAIRS system should be kept in place until a new system was put in place to replace it. The secretariat decided not to follow our recommendation at the time. That led to the demise of CAIRS and led to the complaints, which led to our investigation, and it was a very lengthy investigation.
I could have closed this investigation last year, but what has happened since then is that we've had some really good discussions with the secretariat and we're sensing a real openness in terms of the disclosure logs and having disclosures of access requests posted online. Once there was that openness and the willingness to work with institutions and continue in that vein, it led us to then conclude the investigation. We're going to continue to collaborate with Treasury Board Secretariat to see how this evolves over time.