For instance, there's the disclosure of statistical data free of charge, the disclosure of geospatial data, the disclosure of weather data, the disclosure of immigration data. This can be disclosed proactively. There's the disclosure of access to information requests that are completed and received within institutions.
Whether or not institutions can disclose the documents that are the subject of the access to information request requires, I think, more work, because if there is a particular requester who makes an access to information request, sometimes there is information that is personal to this requester, and it would not be available to the general public. But presumably all the other redactions under the legislation would be the same for everyone.
That's what generates more work. That's why the recommendation we made to the secretariat, as a first step, is to disclose the access to information requests that are received and post the ones that are completed.
What this means is that if you then see this list and want to make an access to information request and see that it's the same one, the institution will already have produced that information. So it's actually easier for the institution; all they have to do is make sure they're not disclosing to another person information that's personal to the first person.