I want to point out that in spite of the fact that the environment department got an F on its report, they were held up as a model by the Information Commissioner in relation to the initiatives on open government. The data sets of material that are made available to the public were I think a great stride forward.
It's difficult for me to understand how on the one hand your department is held out as a model related to the release of these data sets, and on the other hand we're having difficulty achieving a good mark on the release of access to information requests. I understand, because of the problems you've outlined, about the volume and some of the other challenges, but could you help me understand how you've done so well on the open government initiative?