I would put anti-spam enforcement in two different buckets. There are compliance efforts, and then there's education of the broad public and education of other stakeholders that we work with. There's education so that people know how to recognize spam. One of the problems is that spam is becoming so sophisticated that it continues to draw in more and more people, or at least the same number of people, so just keeping the public up to date on the latest kinds of spam attacks is going to be an ongoing effort.
Because we haven't had spam legislation before, we want to encourage them to come forward and give us information about where and how, information about who is suffering from spam attacks in Canada and what kind of damage these attacks are causing. Some of this information will then go into what is colloquially called the spam freezer, which I think is a spam research centre that will provide forward-looking research and compliance information.