The Privacy Commissioner of Canada, in her letter of findings, said that the data should be destroyed to the extent that there aren't any other legal obligations to preserve the data. She was clear about this in her report. Actually, my recollection is that when she testified before this committee, her evidence was that there might be reasons beyond the control of her or of Google that would require the data to be retained, and that an analysis has to be done to ensure that the other obligations we would have are met.
When the data in Ireland was destroyed, an analysis was done, and we concluded that it was okay to destroy that data. The same analysis is happening today for the Canadian payload data. It's just that the analysis is happening at different points in time, and therefore there are different facts on the ground, because things changed between now and May—mainly, all sorts of investigations and legal proceedings that may make it more complicated to destroy the data. But again, I'm not an expert in the rules around that, so I can't opine on those considerations.