Just let me just double-check something.
Just on that point, I can give you my understanding of parliamentary law, and of course when you get into these international situations, it does become somewhat complicated. But Mr. Poilievre accurately stated that anything that's said before a parliamentary committee, including this committee, is subject to parliamentary privilege and, as a result, cannot be used in any courts, tribunals, or evidence-gathering bodies in Canada. What the Chair is not totally clear on—and I'm not going to opine on it—is whether that parliamentary privilege, which is well known, extends to other international bodies, like the U.S. Supreme Court. I don't have a definitive answer.
I don't know that answer, but I can tell you assuredly that anything said here—and that would include anyone who is testifying before the committee via teleconference—cannot be used in any other court, or tribunal, or body, for that matter.