At least we'll get the chapter downloaded. Maybe the clerk would circulate at least the chapter you want us to read, or at least the link. That way we don't have to cut down the trees. That would be great.
We'd be better off to read it and figure it out. I don't know what the work of the committee will be, but it sounds as though there is some low-hanging fruit that we could pick, even if this ends up being a fairly long study. You've given us some food for thought on what could be done as an interim report and on some things like CAIRS, which I think this committee has already sent a motion to restore.
As you know, the Information Commissioner said that if we're going to do this thing, one of the things to do is involve the public as we go. We've been quite excited by the response of both the House of Commons and the Library of Parliament to help us do that at this committee.
We would love your advice as to how you would proceed and the kinds of questions we should be asking the public as we proceed. As my colleague asked, what information would you want up first and in terms of prioritizing? There is the issue around language and translation on demand. If it meant you could release much more, would that be a possible approach?
Give the committee any advice on how to proceed, who else we need to talk to, and whether we should bring you back when we're part way along.