To unpack those few questions, I don't have an answer for why the decision was made to cancel the CAIRS database. I recall there was a fairly robust discussion at the time. I still think that, as was said at the time, it was a mistake, largely because the information is, of course, still available; this only creates a bit of a speed bump or barrier for those who might want to access it.
Fundamentally, even just from a basic economic perspective and not just in terms of government spending, the amount of duplication when there are multiple requests for basically the same sort of information.... If we've taken the position that this information ought to be made available by law and have gone to the expense of pulling it together and have gone through some of the various limitations that exist within the Access to Information Act, it seems to me to make a whole lot of sense to try to make it as readily available as possible. Clearly that view is shared by governments from across the political spectrum, whether you're talking about government in the U.K. or one that's in the United States.