That is something different. I should have answered the question before, and drawn the distinction between open data and open government. Access to documents on parliamentary proceedings and the workings of government is one thing, but even if you make that information available to the public, a company cannot use it as a money-making opportunity.
In my view, it really has nothing to do with the documents, because they are just numbers. They are 1s and 0s that have been collected by the government for a hundred years. You do not have to translate GPS data.
We should distinguish between two aspects of open government. On one hand, there are the databases that can create an economic advantage, and on the other, there are all those other legal, problematic and political considerations. They either have to be translated or they do not. Those are all things that cost money, and my colleagues can speak to that. There are other problems, not just cost.
It is best to split them into two categories, so as not to impede the economic benefits, because it is not known whether the information will be translated or not, since a lot of data are not relevant.