Thank you. You have a number of questions.
First of all, there's no doubt that we're trying to work with the low-hanging fruit first, as you put it. That's absolutely the case, because the data that are readily available already in machine-readable format with translated metadata are fantastic, and we certainly will be looking to put that online first.
One of the strategies we're considering for the portal is the ability to use it as a vehicle for users to ask whether we have information on X or Y if that information is not available whenever we launch. We certainly would be using that capability as a way to gauge feedback from the public. As well, we would be able to see the most popular topics or departments or combinations of areas that the public might be interested in by what they are accessing.
Certainly the behaviour of the public on existing sites is definitely a key indicator of what they're interested in. For instance, we can look at Info Source statistics to determine the most visited sections within Info Source. While Info Source doesn't make data available in machine-readable format, it's certainly a source of information we are studying to see where the visits are. After the homepage for Info Source, where they go is usually a kind of telltale as to what they're interested in.
It's definitely a multi-phase strategy. We do want to start with low-hanging fruit, in a limited way, and carefully assess progress, assess how the reaction is, and use that as a basis for justifying, from a cost-benefit perspective, the need to extend that to more data sets, and perhaps spend more time and effort getting a broader base of data that we could publish one day.