Thank you, Mr. Chair. If I don't use all of my time I'll split it with Mr. Abbott.
Gentlemen, I'm just going to make a statement here and then ask a broad question, and I would like you both to answer it if you would, please.
In your remarks, Mr. Worthy, I'm reading here about the aims, the better decision-making. You were hoping that was going to be one of the aims of the FOI, to improve the quality of decision-making. It was also hoped that it would show the citizens how government works and how decisions are taken. Then you talk a bit about other countries' experiences and how some of those are a bit ambiguous. You talk about Australia. You talk about Canada. You also talk a little bit again about the United Kingdom, where the FOI is one part of a wider drive by government to disseminate more in higher-quality information. Then you go on to say that it's primarily through the media, though the Internet has been trumpeted as a new instrument.
How much do you rely on the media and how much do you rely on other methods such as social media or the Internet to get information relayed? Have there been any negative aspects to what's taken place in the U.K.?
Would both of you answer that, please?