Okay.
I would therefore ask our clerk to go to the mips2010.ca website. Please print out all of the information under their agenda link and circulate it in both official languages to all the members.
Now that we've had input from the members on this, and I think Madame Freeman led us off very well, I'm going to ask the researchers to give us a preliminary starting point, a work plan on the issues related to the Information Commissioner. We're going to start off there.
April 29 is the kickoff for the meeting on the proactive disclosure, so we'll have lots of time to get some information.
So starting basically in May.... That's our time horizon to see about the availability of the other witnesses. As a starting point, the principal witnesses are Treasury Board, Quebec, and the Information Commissioner.
The idea is that we want to have at least a week of meetings scheduled and keep ahead of the curve. We will deal with the conference in Toronto at our next meeting and see how that goes.
I would just ask for the committee's direction. If no one else can attend, does the committee want to make sure that we have at least one representative, or maybe two, from the Library of Parliament to attend, to help us with our project? Is that a good idea?