So with regard to these specific recommendations, it seems like you and the Privy Council Office quite clearly don't agree on a number of them.
Certainly, the first one is a very broad and pretty fundamental one, where you recommend “that the Clerk of the Privy Council demonstrate leadership in establishing access to information as an institutional priority without exception”. That's pretty clear and straightforward. The response kind of says, yes, we sort of do that, but it doesn't.... Do you find it an acceptable response? I guess that's my question.