It actually sounds quite concerning and quite alarming. What seems to be the case, I would guess, is that not only would they just.... We've heard from previous witnesses who've said here that there's a lot of hybrid information on some of these documents, and hybrid documents where some of the information might be section 68.1 and some of it might not be.
If the organization doesn't actually retrieve the records to look at the records, and makes the case based on just the simple question of the access question that is being asked, do you think they're simply considering the source, as in who's asking the question, and making the determination that way?