I'm not going to be as specific as you in your question. Having been an expert in cases that have gone as far as the Supreme Court, I would say that generally a person waits for the ruling of the courts before seeing whether the legislation should be changed or not. Seeing that there is a parallel debate while the case is before the courts is sort of what makes the political scientist and journalism professor in me a little uncomfortable. I think that out of respect for the courts, whether we like them or not, it might be a good idea to wait, although the matter is very important. We need to see to what extent the CBC is subject to that legislation. Is it urgent today? That’s what I’m wondering.
On October 25th, 2011. See this statement in context.