What I do believe in terms of access to information is that the act provides for adequate protection. I also review informants' names and locations in very confidential national security matters, top secret matters. The office is there as an oversight body. The documents are reviewed in a very secure manner, and decisions made within my office lead to recommendations to the entity. They still have the opportunity, if they disagree with my recommendations, to present their case to the court. That's the way our system works.
I think it is a fundamental tenet of freedom of information and of that right, nationally and internationally, that there be the right of independent oversight. In fact, I advocate all the time that I should have oversight over cabinet confidences as well, for the same reasons.