As I said, I think there should be, as a matter of principle, broad coverage. I think ministers' offices should be covered. I think anywhere public funds are essentially being administered and spent should be covered by access to information legislation.
I think that in most instances, if not all, the exemptions should be discretionary, which allows for a harms test and a public interest analysis. I think that provides adequate protection for the most confidential of information.
What it does is allow for independent oversight. It also allows for a case-by-case analysis, which takes into account the public interest, and that is consistent with modern principles of access to information internationally.