Regarding this asinine motion before us, you want to be the judge, jury, and executioner of freedom of information requests, yet you don't even have knowledge of our justice system—or the right to appeal things through our justice system. But now you want to be the information commissioner of Parliament. Putting this information before a committee, unredacted, is totally bizarre. I don't know where this is coming from. I suspect, again, they know the answer to this question; this type of information is before the courts. They're looking for a request on section 68.1 regarding both redacted and unredacted information, and now they want to act as judges of these issues.
Where to go from here? How much longer is this charade going to continue? This is totally unproductive.
I'd like the clerk to read the second part of the motion, where it details the information they want from Quebecor, because it was thrown on the table and we weren't given any notice or research. Could you read the second part, where it talks of Quebecor?